ORDER NOW



 
WINNING STRATEGIES FOR FATHERS IN
CUSTODY & CHILD SUPPORT DISPUTES
" Hard To Find Examples Of Actions To Protect Fathers Rights"

"Tort Claims, Setting Aside Defaults, And More"!

 This manual specifically contains valuable, hard to find, information on vacating or settings aside a
burdensome order, definitions of "Tort Actions" that fathers should have a working knowledge of to
protect themselves, checklist of necessary elements of selected causes of action, complaint drafting
checklist, sample notice of Lis Pendens (lien on the assets while you're suing the "X", sample general
denial answer, affirmative defense checklist, sample answer setting forth affirmative defenses, equal
protection clause/federal decisions binding on lower courts, what to do if due process rights are
denied, sample lawsuit against the "X", the state, state officials including the judge for denial of
constitutional due process rights, how to sue a lawyer, how to sue a judge and much, much more.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

     -    THE GOLDEN RULE
     -    THE NATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF FATHERS RIGHTS STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
     -    INSPIRATIONAL QUOTATIONS FOR FATHERS
     -    INTRODUCTION
TYPE: GETTING RID OF (VACATING/SETTING ASIDE A JUDGMENT) UNSAVORY  ORDERS
TYPE: DECLARING A MARRIAGE INVALID
TYPE: DEFINITIONS OF TORT ACTIONS THAT FATHERS SHOULD HAVE A  WORKING
            KNOWLEDGE OF TO PROTECT THEMSELVES.
TYPE: CHECKLIST OF NECESSARY ELEMENTS OF SELECTED CAUSES OF ACTION
TYPE: DEFINITION OF USURY TO COMBAT EXCESSIVE INTERESTS RATES ON BACK DUE
            CHILD SUPPORT
TYPE:  JURAT
TYPE: COMPLAINT DRAFTING CHECKLIST
TYPE: NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS
TYPE: GENERAL DENIAL ANSWER FOR USE IN NON-DOMESTIC-TYPE ACTIONS
TYPE: AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE CHECKLIST
TYPE: BOILERPLATE LANGUAGE FOR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
TYPE: ANSWER SETTING FORTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
TYPE: PARENTAL RIGHTS CANNOT BE TERMINATED WITHOUT CLEAR AND  CONVINCING
            EVIDENCE
TYPE: COURT ORDERS AGAINST FATHER THE RESULT OF PASSION AND/OR
            PREJUDICE
TYPE: COURTS MAY NOT SUBJECT MEN AND WOMEN TO DISPARATE TREATMENT
TYPE: EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, FEDERAL DECISIONS BINDING ON THE  LOWER
            COURTS, EQUAL PROTECTION
TYPE: PARENTS HAVE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PARENT THEIR CHILDREN
TYPE: FATHERS HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM UNREASONABLE STATE
            INTERFERENCE IN THE RAISING OF THEIR CHILDREN.
TYPE: EXISTENCE OF SUBSTANTIAL RELATIONSHIP IS CRITERION IN BEST  INTERESTS OF
            THE CHILDREN.
TYPE: FATHER TREATED AS A STRANGER TO HIS CHILDREN
TYPE: PARENTS INTEREST IN THE COMPANIONSHIP, CARE, CUSTODY, AND
            MANAGEMENT OF HIS CHILDREN.
TYPE: FATHERS RIGHT TO RAISE HIS OWN CHILDREN
TYPE: MEN AND WOMEN MUST BE TREATED EQUALLY
TYPE: DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS RIGHTS--14TH AMENDMENT
TYPE: THE "X", THE STATE, STATE OFFICIALS, INCLUDING THE JUDGE, LIABLE
TYPE: STATE OFFICIALS OPERATING UNDER COLOR OF STATE LAWS
TYPE: CHILD SUPPORT IS NOT REALISTICALLY RELATED TO RAISING A  CHILD
TYPE: BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD NOT SERVED SINCE CHILD WAS NOT  PROPERLY
            REPRESENTED--VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS RIGHTS
TYPE: FATHERS SEEKS CUSTODY OF DAUGHTER WHEN MOTHER HAS SEVERE  DRUG
           AND/OR ALCOHOL PROBLEM
TYPE: RESPONSE AND DEFENSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALLEGATIONS AND
            RESTRAINING ORDER OBTAINED BY THE "X" BASED UPON FALSE  ALLEGATIONS
TYPE: MOTION TO OBTAIN CUSTODY OF CHILDREN PRIOR TO FILING FOR WRIT  OF HABEAS
            CORPUS
TYPE: PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
TYPE: ORDER TO ISSUE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND WARRANT IN AID OF  WRIT OF
            HABEAS CORPUS
TYPE: WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
TYPE: MOTION FOR TEMPORARY ORDERS SEEKING TO QUASH WAGE ASSIGNMENT,
            LOWER SUPPORT, DEAL WITH ARREARAGES
TYPE: AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
TYPE: WRIT OF PROHIBITION
TYPE: PRO SE LITIGANTS DUE EXTRA CONSIDERATION BECAUSE OF SUPREME  COURT
            RULING.
TYPE: JUDGES CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT OUTLINES MANDATORY BEHAVIOR  FOR
            JUDGES.
TYPE: CHILD SUPPORT INCORRECTLY FIGURED UPON "IMPUTED" (WHAT YOU  SHOULD BE
            MAKING, BUT ARE NOT MAKING) INCOME/INPUTED INCOME  IS INVOLUNTARY
            SERVITUDE
TYPE: FATHER ARGUES NOT TO IMPUTE INCOME BECAUSE MOTHER IS CAPABLE  OF
            WORKING AND BECAUSE ANY INCREASE WOULD WORK AN ECONOMIC  HARDSHIP
            AND SUBSTANTIAL INJUSTICE UPON THE FATHER.
TYPE: ACTION BROUGHT BY FATHER TO VACATE A CHILD SUPPORT ARREARAGE,
            ALLEGED BY THE STATE, BECAUSE HE IS RETIRED AND HE AND THE  CHILD ARE
            DRAWING SOCIAL SECURITY
TYPE: DEFINITION OF CIVIL LAW--USEFUL TO UNDERSTAND HOW SYSTEM FOR
            COLLECTION OF CHILD SUPPORT WORKS
TYPE: EQUITY, PAST AND PRESENT AS IT APPLIES TO FAIRNESS IN THE  PRESENT DAY COURT
            SYSTEM
TYPE: LEGAL ETHICS, JUDICIAL CANONS, ABA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
TYPE: FATHERS ACTION AGAINST THE "X" FOR CONTEMPT
TYPE: CONTEMPT AGAINST THE MOTHER FOR DENIAL OF VISITATION
TYPE: JURISTICTION AND TERMS OF POST SECONDARY EDUCATION EXTENDED  AGE OF
           MAJORITY; A  VIOLATION OF PRIVACY AND EQUAL  PROTECTION
TYPE: ONLY FATHER REQUIRED TO CARRY LIFE INSURANCE AND WILL ESTATE
-     GLOSSARY
-     POWER RESOURCES FOR FATHERS
     -    WHERE TO GO FOR MORE INFORMATION
                -   BIBLIOGRAPHY
                -   RESOURCE LIST OF ADDRESSESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS
                    USEFULL TO FATHERS
  -    RESOURCE LIST OF ADDRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS
     -     A FEW PARTING QUOTATIONS ON DIVORCE AND "THE SYSTEM"


 RETURN TO MAIN PAGE